Columbia International Affairs Online: Working Papers

CIAO DATE: 02/2015

Talking with the Taliban: Should the Afghan Constitution Be a Point of Negotiation?

Sean Kane

January 2015

United States Institute of Peace

Abstract

Drawing on the comparative experiences of governments negotiating with insurgencies in the Philippines, Myanmar, and Colombia, as well as a detailed examination of the Taliban’s possible constitutional demands, this report examines the 2004 Afghan constitution with respect to its potential inclusion in peace talks between government and Taliban leaders. It argues that, if the issue is handled carefully and with strategic intent, the Afghan government may be able to seize the political high ground by challenging the Taliban to justify some of its more unpopular constitutional positions to other Afghans.