Columbia International Affairs Online: Working Papers

CIAO DATE: 05/2008

Studying violent radicalization in Europe II: The potential contribution of socio-psychological and psychological approaches

Anja Dalgaard-Nielsen

March 2008

Danish Institute for International Studies

Abstract

Why do some apparently well-integrated youth in Europe become attracted to Islamist militancy? Why and when do people cross from violent talk to violent action? What prevents others, exposed to the same political, ideological, and socioeconomic influences, from crossing? When and how might people de-radicalize and draw back from violent action? What policy initiatives would be called for to limit the spread of radical ideas, counter the factors that spur violent radicalization, and strengthen those, which pull in the other direction? In sum: When, why, and how do people living in a democracy become radicalized to the point of being willing to use or directly support the use of terrorist violence against civilians, and what can be done about it?

These questions have been at the center of both academic and public debate over the past years. Yet, there is still a scarcity of empirically based knowledge and no consensus with regard to which theories and approaches to apply to the study of violent radicalization and mobilization.

This working paper explores the potential contribution of socio-psychological and psychological approaches to throw light on the question of why and how violent radicalization occurs in Europe.

The paper first provides an overview of the main schools and major scholars working with socio-psychological and psychological approaches within the field of terrorism studies. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches and identifies the most promising avenues for further research: Group process approaches and Identity Theory. Finally, the paper elaborates on the specific issues and questions highlighted by group process approaches and Identity Theory respectively.