From the CIAO Atlas Map of Middle East 

email icon Email this citation

CIAO DATE: 11/03


Ban Hamas in Europe

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy

Jeff Cary and Matthew Levitt

Peace Watch #430
September 4, 2003

On June 25, 2003, shortly after the initiation of the Quartet Roadmap to Israeli-Palestinian peace, President George W. Bush urged European Union (EU) leaders to take "swift, decisive action against [Palestinian] terror groups such as Hamas, to cut off their funding and support." Much of the funding received by Hamas's military wing, the Izzedine al-Qassam Brigades, is provided by donations to the organization's social and political activities.

At the EU summit meeting in Thessaloniki, Greece, on June 19-20, EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana told reporters that Europe is ready, "if [Hamas] is not willing to cooperate in a constructive manner for a ceasefire, to take some measures particularly on the money and financial support of this organization." Both the August 12 suicide bombing at the Jewish settlement of Ariel and the devastating bus bombing in Jerusalem on August 19 (which killed 21 and injured over 100, including many children) clearly demonstrate Hamas's intention to scuttle the peace process. Hamas has also increased the range of its Gaza-based Qassam rockets, which hit the Israeli coastal city of Ashkelon (population 116,000) for the first time on August 28.

On September 5-6, European foreign ministers will meet in Italy, and the EU will again have the opportunity to make good on Solana's promise to curtail the group's funding. By now it should be clear that the EU will not prevent funds raised and laundered in Europe from financing Hamas terrorist attacks unless it bans the social and political "wings" that fund and facilitate such attacks and generate grassroots support for the group.

 

Evidence for the EU

Those still unconvinced that Hamas's terrorist wing has roots in Europe and is supported by the organization's political wing should consider the following examples:

 

Taking Action

It is long past time for the EU to recognize that Hamas has been able to muddy the waters between charitable giving and terrorism in large part because so many European governments fall for the sophistic argument that terrorist groups maintain distinct political and militant wings. Hamas uses the hospitals it maintains as meeting places; buries caches of arms and explosives under its own kindergarten playgrounds; uses social-welfare operatives' cars and homes to ferry and hide fugitives; and transfers and launders funds for terrorist activity through local charity committees. Indeed, just last week, the Palestinian Authority (PA) itself announced that it frozen the accounts of nine local Islamic charities on suspicion that they were funding Hamas. Funds from abroad support these local Hamas fronts.

U.S. investigators have been aware of this problem for some time. An FBI memorandum on the Holy Land Foundation noted that Hamas's "benevolent programs are used to enhance its image and earn goodwill in the Palestinian community." FBI surveillance of a 1993 Hamas meeting in Philadelphia discovered Hamas fundraisers deciding that "most or almost all" funds collected from that point on "should be directed to enhance the Islamic Resistance Movement [Hamas] and to weaken the self-rule government [PA]." For reasons unknown, European decisionmakers failed to act on such evidence when it was presented to them.

Palestinians do indeed face dire social-welfare needs that are not addressed by the PA, and Hamas exploits this suffering to increase its popular support. It is critical that humanitarian support for needy Palestinians be detached from support for terrorist activity. This can only be accomplished, however, if the EU and other states (particularly those of the Persian Gulf) strictly regulate which Palestinian charities receive international aid and shut down front organizations that are raising funds for Hamas and other terrorist groups.

Judging by Solana's statement in June, the EU withheld its decision to crack down on affiliates of Hamas's political wing so as not to upset the delicate ceasefire between Hamas and the PA. Yet, it has become increasingly apparent that the group never intended to become a permanent partner for peace. Rather, Hamas used the ceasefire to rebuild, reorganize, rearm, and refinance. Hamas's resumption of terrorist attacks shows that it remains committed to its twin goals of murdering Israelis and undermining the PA and the peace process. Cutting off European funds to the social-political-military animal that is Hamas would make a significant contribution toward reversing these trends.

Jeff Cary and Matthew Levitt are, respectively, research assistant and senior fellow in terrorism studies at The Washington Institute.