From the CIAO Atlas Map of Middle East 

email icon Email this citation

CIAO DATE: 11/03


Between Hudna and Crackdown: Assessing the Record of Hamas Ceasefires

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy

Shoshanah Haberman

Peace Watch #424
June 2, 2003

In recent days, both Palestinian Authority (PA) chairman Yasir Arafat and prime minister Mahmoud Abbas have said they expect an agreement on a Hamas ceasefire (or hudna) to be announced soon. According to Abbas, Hamas -- in Arabic, "the Islamic Resistance Movement" -- "will commit to halting terrorism, both within the green line and in the territories." As longtime Palestinian minister Saeb Erekat explained, Abbas needs a ceasefire agreement to jumpstart negotiations for Palestinian statehood. Abbas, said Erekat, "will insist on this declaration [of a ceasefire] because that's the key . . . for him to go out and tell the Palestinians, 'Look, we've got the Israeli government to recognize the Palestinian state, [so] we need two years in a peaceful, meaningful peace process.'"

So far, no Hamas leaders have contradicted Abbas, though they have added conditions to any ceasefire, such as an Israeli agreement to end targeted killings and free prisoners. Even Hamas spiritual leader Shaykh Ahmad Yassin did not reject the idea of a hudna, though he cautioned that Hamas would never voluntarily give up its weapons. Indeed, if the past is any indication, a ceasefire agreement is likely; such ceasefires have been regular occurrences in PA-Hamas relations.

 

Ceasefire Redux

In all, ten ceasefires have been declared or offered by Hamas since 1993. In some cases, they followed periods of PA-Hamas confrontation; at other times, they came on the heels of intense pressure placed on the PA after particularly egregious acts of terrorism committed by Hamas or other groups. It is important to note that all ceasefire offers have been presented at a time when Hamas needed a moment to step back and regroup after an organizationally exhausting confrontation with a more powerful foe (either Israel or the PA).

Throughout each of these ceasefire episodes, Hamas leaders continued to support the goals of the original Hamas charter, that is, the creation, through religiously sanctioned violence, of an Islamic state in all of Palestine. Again, this suggests that Hamas ceasefires have served as "breathers," allowing the organization to consolidate its "gains" -- be they against the PA or Israel -- before undertaking another set of attacks.

Prime Minister Abbas has stated that a temporary ceasefire would be unacceptable and that he would insist on "absolute calm." Yet, this falls short of the Roadmap's call for "dismantlement of terrorist capabilities and infrastructure." Indeed, without PA efforts to dismantle the considerable military infrastructure built by Hamas, to deprive its leaders of broadcast and print media outlets, to shut down training and operational facilities, and to collect weapons, there is nothing to prevent any new ceasefire from going the way of previous ones. Moreover, similar efforts would need to be taken against other terrorist groups, whether Islamist (like Palestinian Islamic Jihad) or nationalist (like Fatah's al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades). When asked recently about the possibility of using force against Hamas or any other militant faction in order to ensure disarmament, Abbas stated, "We will never give civil war a chance, even if the agreement is breached."

This PeaceWatch was prepared by Washington Institute research assistant Shoshanah Haberman, drawing on a past article by Seth Wikas (PeaceWatch no. 357, January 3, 2002).