Political Science Quarterly
Issue 114, No. 1 (Spring 1999)
Abstracts
Barry M. Blechman and Tamara Cofman Wittes examine the uses of military threats and military interventions in the Bush and first Clinton administrations. Based on case studies and interviews with U.S. decision makers, they conclude that domestic and international political constraints are preventing U.S. leaders from making threats decisive enough to persuade foreign leaders to comply with U.S. demands.
Gary C. Jacobson analyzes the 1998 U.S. congressional elections to determine why voters strongly endorsed the political status quo despite the presidents involvement in a scandal that led to his impeachment by the House of Representatives.
James Burk challenges the hypothesis that public support for peacekeeping missions vanishes once casualties are taken. He identifies logical problems with the underlying theory and shows that its empirical predictions are not supported in the critical cases of Lebanon and Somalia.
Leonard W. Levy discusses English and American history to determine the sources and development of the U.S. Constitutions Fourth Amendment barring unreasonable searches and seizures. He concludes that general warrants and warrantless searches were the norm until the American Revolution, when specific warrants began to emerge, especially in Massachusetts.
Michael Mcfaul explains why Russias change from communist rule has been so protracted and conflictual in comparison with other democratic transitions. He focuses on the strategic interaction of individual actors, rather than cultural or historical factors, to build an explanation for Russias troubled transition.
James J. Wirtz reviews H.R. McMasters Dereliction of Duty, which argues that the Joint Chiefs of Staff failed to devise an effective strategy in Vietnam. He questions McMasters claim that the Joint Chiefs quickly recognized that U.S. forces had only limited prospects for success in Southeast Asia and failed to inform the Johnson administration about their reservations concerning American military intervention in Southeast Asia.
Book Reviews