International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

August 2003 (Volume 3, No. 2)

 

‘Mirror, mirror, on the wall’: misplaced polarities in the study of Southeast Asian security
by N. Ganesan

Abstract

Recent interpretative literature on Southeast Asian security has led to a polarized debate between realists and constructivists. This article argues that the differences between the two seemingly irreconciliable approaches can be reconciled if the methodologies underlying the approaches are subjected to greater scrutiny. Generally, both approaches are sensitive to environmental conditions, both in terms of time and place. Additionally, realism is better suited to explain turbulence in Southeast Asian international relations, while constructivism is better suited during times of peace and prosperity.