Columbia International Affairs Online

CIAO DATE: 12/07

Ambassadors Review

Ambassadors Review

Fall 2004

 

Major Management Accomplishments at the Department of State Since 2001

Grant S. Green, Jr

Full Text

Grant S. Green, Jr., Under Secretary of State for Management

I really wear two hats: by law, I am the principal foreign policy advisor of the President of the United States, but I am also the leader, the manager, the CEO of the Department of State, and I take that role and that charge very, very seriously. And to be successful, I think in both roles, we have to make sure—I have to make sure—that the Department is properly organized, equipped and manned to conduct America’s foreign policy.

--Secretary of State Colin L. Powell
May 2001



This quote from Secretary Powell is indicative of the emphasis placed on the management of the Department over the past three and a half years. In 2001, we faced a situation in which the Department of State was widely criticized by the United States (US) Congress, Department employees, government-sponsored studies, and several independent studies for the way it was managed. For too long the Department had insufficient funding, a severe shortage of personnel, a lack of emphasis on training, a lack of real budget planning, antiquated information technology, and many insecure facilities in poor condition. When he became Secretary, Colin Powell said that he did not need further studies but that it was time to fix these well-documented problems.

Since January 2001, the Secretary’s management priorities--frequently and consistently enunciated by the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, and me within the Department, in public speeches, and in Congressional testimony--have been: People, Security, Technology, Facilities and Management Reform and Improvement. Key to this, we have worked hard within the administration and on the Hill to obtain the resources to support initiatives and very much appreciate the support we have received from both.

Implementing the President’s Management Agenda (PMA)--the government-wide strategy for improving the management performance of the federal government--has been integral to achieving results in these management priorities.

I will illustrate below some of the key things that have been done by the Department in the management area over the past three and a half years. For a more detailed discussion, you may access the Department’s full Results Report, which was issued in August 2004, at www.state.gov/m/p/results/index.htm. Each Cabinet department and major agency issued a parallel report, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published a government-wide report. This process gave us a good opportunity to stand back and look at what has been done by the Department and its employees, especially those on the management team, to address the problems we found in 2001.

People

First priority was given by Secretary Powell to Department staffing and the people who work for the Department:

We improved our recruitment and hiring processes to ensure that we hire the best talent available:

We also are using a number of successful tools to recruit and retain people for critical positions:

Security

Technology

Facilities

We are improving the quality of the workplace in the Harry S. Truman building:

Management Reform and Improvement

Conclusion

Much has been accomplished in the management area over the past three and a half years, but much remains to be done. As the above discussion demonstrates, we have a number of key initiatives to further the Secretary’s management priorities in progress.

We await the assessment of the Foreign Affairs Council, which issued its first report on the Department under Secretary Powell in March 2003 and will publish another one covering the Secretary’s entire tenure this Fall. We will examine the recommendations carefully.

One additional step we have recently taken is to create an Advisory Committee on Leadership and Management. The Committee is composed of prominent individuals from academe and the business world as well as former members of Congress. This Committee will give us and future management teams advice on what we have done right and wrong and how to build on what has been accomplished so far because in the final analysis management issues must continue to be a high priority for the Department and its leadership.