CIAO DATE: 03/2011
Volume: 11, Issue: 1
January 2011
The absence of non-western IR theory in Asia reconsidered (PDF)
Ching-Chang Chen
This paper critically examines an ongoing debate in International Relations (IR) as to why there is apparently no non-Western IR theory in Asia and what should be done to ‘mitigate’ that situation. Its central contention is that simply calling for greater incorporation of ideas from the non-West and contributions by non-Western scholars from local ‘vantage points’ does not make IR more global or democratic, for that would do little to transform the discipline's Eurocentric epistemological foundations. Re-envisioning IR in Asia is not about discovering or producing as many ‘indigenous’ national schools of IR as possible, but about reorienting IR itself towards a post-Western era that does not reinforce the hegemony of the West within (and without) the discipline. Otherwise, even if local scholars could succeed in crafting a ‘Chinese (or Indian, Japanese, Korean, etc.) School’, it would be no more than constructing a ‘derivative discourse’ of Western modernist social science.
Sung-Han Kim, Geun Lee
This study delves into an empirical case analysis of the desecuritization process of the North Korean threat under the Kim Dae-jung government. Unlike previous studies, it analyzes how domestic and international actors desecuritized traditional threats by taking the pluralistic political processes of a democratic polity seriously. This was the process of competition between different political coalitions and the process of transformation from issues of high politics into issues of low politics. It remains to be seen whether the Kim Dae-jung government's desecuritization of North Korean threats was a deep or a shallow one, but it appears to be clear that the desecuritization of North Korean threats by the Kim Dae-jung government paved the way for another 5 years of progressive government with Roh Moo-hyun's ‘unexpected' victory in the 2002 presidential election.
East Asian relative peace and the ASEAN Way (PDF)
Timo Kivimäki
East Asia has experienced a drastic decline in incidences of warfare and has had exceptionally low levels of battle deaths after 1979. However, East Asian peace had already begun in 1967 inside ASEAN. Is it possible that East Asian peace began in ASEAN and spread to the rest of East Asia? This is the question that this article aims to tackle by showing the association between a reasonable and plausible explanation, the ASEAN Way, and East Asian peace after 1979. The argument about the role of the ASEAN approach in the pacification of East Asia is based on an examination of the patterns of frequency of conflicts, numbers of battle deaths and conflict termination. In this kind of examination, it seems that the recipes for peace in East Asia after 1979 are similar to those of ASEAN after 1967, and that their relationship to conflicts was also very similar.
The origin of trilateralism? The US–Japan–Australia security relations in the 1990s (PDF)
Tomohiko Satake
This paper analyzes US–Japan–Australia security relations in the 1990s. Since the establishment of the Trilateral Strategic Dialogue (TSD) in 2005, there have been a growing number of studies which focus on the TSD or bilateral security relations between Japan and Australia ( Terada, 2006; Williams and Newman, 2006; Tow et al., 2007; The National Bureau of Asian Research, 2008). The announcement of the Joint Security Declaration between Japan and Australia in 2006 also received wide attention from researchers interested in the security policies of each country or Asia-Pacific security in general ( Bisley, 2006; Sato, 2008; Cook and Shearer, 2009). These studies focus mainly on the current development of US–Japan–Australia or Japan–Australia security relations in various dimensions, such as peacekeeping, non-proliferation, disaster relief, and other forms of multilateral cooperation. In particular, many studies emphasize that Japanese and Australian contributions to the US-led ‘global war on terror’ significantly upgraded their respective alliance relations, leading to the creation of the TSD ( Jain and Bruni, 2006; Wolton, 2006). In comparison, few studies exclusively focus on security relations between the three countries in the 1990s.
Thomas S. Wilkins
As part of its movement toward ‘normal country’ status, Japan has begun to engage in a policy of alliance/alignment restructuring and diversification. This is a twin-track policy – the reconfiguration of existing allied relationships and the creation of new cooperative bilateral links. In recent years, Tokyo has deepened its ties with the United States and Australia on the one hand, while cultivating new partners such as India, as well as several Southeast Asian states. This article examines the nature and dynamics of two of the most important new strategic partnerships: India and Australia. Through a comparative analysis, it seeks to account for their formation, structure, and prospects using a specifically designed model of ‘strategic partnership’ drawn from Organizational Theories literature. It concludes that these strategic partnerships represent a major platform of a more robust and comprehensive security policy on the part of Japan, forged in response to a shifting international environment in the Asia-Pacific region.
Kosuke Shimizu
Takashi Inoguchi once stated that Japan's international relations theory is characterized by its exclusive disciplinary orientation toward constructivism. Nishida Kitaro is widely recognized as one of such constructivists. In this article, I argue that Nishida's theory of world history was based on the perception of subjectivity of contradiction, and was thus exclusively culture-oriented. By emphasizing cultural aspects, he tried to disturb the coherence and consistency of the colonialist discourse on which the dominant regime of Japan of the time was entirely reliant. However, because Nishida's theory of world history completely lacked the recognition of the material relations of the colonizer and the colonized, as a direct consequence of his understanding of the term ‘culture’, his attempts were unrealized.
The Search for Reconciliation: Sino-Japanese and German-Polish Relations since World War II (PDF)
Yoko Iwama
Yinan He adds yet another book on the subject of post-war reconciliation. The aim of her book is to examine the validity of two theories, that of standard realist theory of international relations, and that of ‘national mythmaking theory', in explaining the process and outcome of reconciliation between countries. For this purpose, she examines two post-World War II cases, Sino-Japanese and (West) German-Polish relations. In the end, Yinan He wishes to establish why reconciliation is achieved in some cases and not in others. There is actually little new on Germany and Japan in this book. This topic has been extensively discussed both in journalism and in the academic world. Nevertheless, she does add one new aspect to this subject by bringing into the open how much national myth-making had actually happened not only in Japan but also in China. Thus, she traces how official history treated the CCP, the KMP, and the Japanese since the early post-war days and points out how it ‘retained the self-glorifying and other-maligning myths constructed and institutionalized in the earlier period' (p. 180). She admits that much was politically motivated ideological propaganda. All in all, her narrative is relatively fair to all parties involved. Quantitatively, the book gives German-Polish relations just one chapter whereas Sino-Japanese relations receive four. These chapters are mainly historical narratives and comparative analysis is provided in the final concluding chapter. That Japan …
Welfare and Capitalism in Postwar Japan (PDF)
Michael W. Donnelly
How the welfare state and capitalism coexist is an enduring and highly contentious research question. According to Margarita Estevez-Abe, Japan's welfare state is not easily classified in standard, comparative ways. Despite relatively modest government social spending and benefit levels, for decades the country achieved an egalitarian form of capitalism. Existing theories have been unable to explain the Japan puzzle, we are warned, the odd combination of equality, meager redistributive social spending, and extensive protection from market risk without heavy taxes and massive government expenditures. Yet, recent shifts in welfare policies make explanation all the more urgent. The major purpose of this study is to provide a new theory of the welfare state using Japan as the major case study. Estevez-Abe's argument is that orthodox welfare policies in Japan are used in combination with a wide range of functionally equivalent and highly targeted programs of social protection that until recently resulted in a sort of ‘egalitarianism'. The combination of policy tools, she argues, is best explained by the structural logic of a rational-choice model of election results in combination with theories of veto politics. Through the lens of the model, the author traces the postwar origin and development of social protection policy during the country's ‘miracle’ days of equity with growth. Even in times of economic stress and waves of institutional reform in the 1970s, the regime of social protection remained in place protecting citizens, …